|
|
|
|
Monday, 23- March
|
|
|
|
|
|
8:00 – 8:30
|
Registration
|
|
|
|
|
8:30 – 10:00
|
Opening and introduction to the workshop (agenda and objectives)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ellen Liu, Program Officer, OSI Public Health Program
|
|
|
|
|
|
Introductions of participants (icebreaker and expectations)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Victoria Tymoshevska, Public Health Program Director, International Renaissance Foundation- Kyiv
|
|
|
|
|
10:00 – 10:30
|
Coffee break
|
|
|
|
|
10:30 – 13:00
|
Country team presentations: key findings from situational analyses and project update
|
|
|
|
|
|
Groups will present an overview of key findings of their situational analysis and comment on project work to date.
|
|
|
|
|
13:00 – 14:00
|
Lunch
|
|
|
|
|
14:00 – 15:45
|
Developing Budget Advocacy Strategy: Defining Budget Advocacy Objective, Audience, Message, Messenger, Actions
|
|
|
|
|
|
Teresa Guthrie, Director, CEGAA
|
|
|
|
|
|
Learning objectives ~ participants will:
|
|
|
Understand the key elements of advocacy Find out about the key elements of advocacy strategy
|
|
|
Learn how to develop a strategic budget objective
|
|
|
Understand the relevance and importance of developing a budget advocacy strategy
|
|
|
Recognize why it is essential to link the budget analysis and budget advocacy component of the strategy
|
|
|
|
|
15:45 – 16:15
|
Coffee break
|
|
|
|
|
16:15 – 18:00
|
Basic Research methods & data collection tools: Overview
|
|
|
|
|
|
Teresa Guthrie
|
|
|
|
|
|
Learning Objectives ~ Participants will:
|
|
|
- Have an understanding of the key steps in research
|
|
|
- Have an overview of the different methodologies to apply and discuss their relative benefits
|
|
|
- Have an idea of different sampling techniques so as to select the best option for their purposes
|
|
|
- Specify the indicators for collection
|
|
|
- Design their data collection tools to collect their indicators
|
|
|
- Consider various options for the analysis of their data
|
|
|
|
|
|
Evening work Country Teams develop Project ToRs (one-on-one time with OSI & CEGAA)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Using the Advocacy and Research TOR Framework the country teams will prepare numbers 1-4
|
|
|
|
|
19:00
|
Group Dinner
|
|
|
|
|
Tuesday, 24- March
|
|
|
|
|
|
8:30 – 10:00
|
Intro to Budgets - processes, politics, roles, participation, documents and classifications
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dr. Urbanus Kioko, Programme Manager, CEGGA
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leaning Objectives ~ Participants will:
|
|
|
- Become familiar with the budget terminology and classifications
|
|
|
- Be able to identify the stages of the budget process and potential points of intervention
|
|
|
- Understand the principles of good budgets and apply these in assessing their country budgets
|
|
|
- Identify the key players in the allocative/budget processes and which are primary target audiences of their advocacy campaign
|
|
|
- Become familiar with the structure, layout and content of budgets and know where to find health budget allocations
|
|
|
|
|
10:00 – 10:30
|
Coffee break
|
|
|
|
|
10:30 – 13:00
|
Using Budget Analysis to create the evidence - Budget Calculations I – using specific case studies
|
|
|
|
|
|
Urbanus Kioko/ Teresa Guthrie
|
|
|
|
|
|
Learning Objectives ~ Participants will:
|
|
|
- Be able to calculate the rate of increase in the budget allocations, year on year, for their specific issue.
|
|
|
- Create graphs to show the allocations and the rate of change.
|
|
|
- Calculate the average annual rate of exchange in allocations over a few years (eg. If the budget documents provide past/forward projections for more than one year, such as the MTEF).
|
|
|
- Be able to calculate the per capita spending
|
|
|
|
|
13:00 – 14:00
|
Lunch
|
|
|
|
|
14:00 – 15:45
|
Budget Calculations II - using country specific case studies
|
|
|
|
|
|
Urbanus Kioko / Teresa Guthrie
|
|
|
|
|
|
Learning Objectives ~ Participants will:
|
|
|
- Be able to measure the relative importance on spending on different sectors through proportional analysis.
|
|
|
- Be able to understand the role of inflation and convert nominal figures into real figures (adjusting for inflation)
|
|
|
- Calculate the real percentage increase year on year.
|
|
|
- Show trends in priorities over time using graphs.
|
|
|
|
|
15:45 – 16:15
|
Coffee break
|
|
|
|
|
16:15 – 18:00
|
Budget Calculations III - using country specific case studies
|
|
|
|
|
|
Urbanus Kioko / Teresa Guthrie
|
|
|
|
|
|
Learning Objectives ~ Participants will:
|
|
|
- Be able to measure equity in allocations between regions, between groups, across population.
|
|
|
- Create a graph showing disparities / inequity.
|
|
|
- Make comparisons with other countries.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Evening work Country Teams develop Project ToRs (one-on-one time with OSI & CEGAA)
|
|
|
Using the Advocacy and Research TOR Framework the country teams will prepare numbers 5-8
|
|
|
|
|
Wednesday, 25- March
|
|
|
|
|
|
8:30 – 10:00
|
Tracking expenditure on your issue: basic principles, methods, steps
|
|
|
|
|
|
Teresa Guthrie
|
|
|
|
|
|
Learning Objectives ~ Participants will:
|
|
|
- Become familiar with the different terminology in expenditure tracking and the different sources of data.
|
|
|
- Identify the steps of undertaking expenditure tracking and apply these in their planning projects.
|
|
|
- Undertake the first step of identifying, classifying and coding all the interventions (activities of spending) for their particular issue.
|
|
|
- Get some tips for managing large amounts of expenditure data.
|
|
|
|
|
10:00 – 10:30
|
Coffee break
|
|
|
|
|
10:30 – 12:15
|
Using basic costing techniques to estimate expenditure when there is no expenditure data available
|
|
|
|
|
|
Urbanus Kioko
|
|
|
|
|
|
Learning Objectives ~ Participants will:
|
|
|
- Identify in which circumstances they could apply costing techniques
|
|
|
- Identify which costs should be included in their estimations
|
|
|
- Understand the basic steps in undertaking a cost estimation
|
|
|
- Understand what assumptions have to be made and how these can be validated
|
|
|
|
|
12:15 – 13:15
|
Lunch
|
|
|
|
|
13:15 – 14:45
|
Assessing Outputs of Spending: Social Audits and other Community Tools
|
|
|
|
|
|
Teresa Guthrie
|
|
|
|
|
|
Learning Objectives ~ Participants will:
|
|
|
- Have an overview of some of the tools for community level monitoring:
|
|
|
- Social audit approach
|
|
|
- Citizen report cards
|
|
|
- Client satisfaction surveys
|
|
|
- Procurement system analysis (DEEM tools)
|
|
|
- Consider which method to apply for their purposes/ project
|
|
|
|
|
14:45 – 17:45
|
Applying methods to country projects: Teams discuss and plan their use of various methods with roving facilitators
|
|
|
|
|
|
Learning Objectives ~ Participants will:
|
|
|
- Consider the type of information they require to advance their advocacy agenda, and select the most appropriate research method to collect the data
|
|
|
- Facilitators will provide technical information to assist country teams in their understanding and selection
|
|
|
|
|
16:15 – 16:45
|
Coffee break
|
|
|
|
|
18:00 – 18:30
|
Wrap up discussion
|
|
|
|
|
|
Evening work Country Teams develop Project ToRs (one-on-one time with OSI & CEGAA)
|
|
|
Using the Advocacy and Research TOR Framework the country teams will prepare number 9a-h
|
|
|
|
|
Thursday, 26- March
|
|
|
|
|
|
8:30 – 10:00
|
Stakeholder Mapping and Analysis
|
|
|
|
|
|
Helena Puig Larrauri, HBMAP Intern, OSI Public Health Program
|
|
|
|
|
|
Learning Objectives ~ Participants will:
|
|
|
- Map and analyze stakeholders by interest, power, support, influence, and relationship to them
|
|
|
- Brainstorm possible action steps and ways to apply this to their research and advocacy.
|
|
|
|
|
10:00 – 10:30
|
Coffee break
|
|
|
|
|
10:30 – 13:00
|
Developing Budget Advocacy Strategy: Coalitions, networks, other tactics etc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Urbanus Kioko
|
|
|
|
|
|
Learning Objectives ~ Participants will learn about:
|
|
|
Various tactics and actions
|
|
|
Essential relationships: alliances & coalition building
|
|
|
Media advocacy
|
|
|
|
|
|
Co-operation – Education – Persuasion – Litigation – Contestation
|
|
|
|
|
13:00 – 14:00
|
Lunch
|
|
|
|
|
14:00 – 15:45
|
Presenting Evidence to Create Advocacy Messages:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Images and Graphics/Presentation/Media
|
|
|
|
|
|
Urbanus Kioko
|
|
|
|
|
|
Learning Objectives ~ Participants will:
|
|
|
- Have practice turning evidence into useful graphics
|
|
|
- Learn media tips
|
|
|
- Learn of and practice, new media technologies
|
|
|
|
|
15:45 – 16:15
|
Coffee break
|
|
|
|
|
16:15 – 18:00
|
Presenting Evidence to Create Advocacy Messages:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Country teams prepare messages using their specific case study analyses
|
|
|
|
|
|
Learning Objectives ~ Participants will:
|
|
|
- Apply their learning from the previous session to create their own advocacy messages in a variety of media/ formats
|
|
|
|
|
|
Evening work Country Teams develop Project ToRs (one-on-one time with OSI & CEGAA)
|
|
|
Using the Advocacy and Research TOR Framework the country teams will prepare numbers 10, and use 1 media of your choice to create and present your advocacy message
|
|
|
|
|
Friday, 27- March
|
|
|
|
|
|
8:30 – 10:00
|
Professional Report Preparation and Structuring
|
|
|
|
|
|
Teresa Guthrie /Urbanus Kioko
|
|
|
|
|
|
10:00 – 10:30 Coffee break
|
|
|
|
|
|
10:30 – 13:00 Group presentations
|
|
|
|
|
|
13:00 – 14:00 Lunch
|
|
|
|
|
|
14:00 – 17:45 One on one meetings with country teams
|