|
|
|
|
21- October
|
|
|
|
|
|
Afternoon
|
Registration and welcome
|
|
|
|
|
18:00
|
Optional dinner
|
|
|
|
|
Day 1, 22- October
|
|
|
|
|
|
9:00
|
Registration
|
|
|
|
|
9:15
|
Introductions
|
|
|
|
|
9:30
|
Situating this meeting
|
|
|
Jonathan Cohen
|
|
|
|
|
|
LAHI has a history of training lawyers and human rights advocates on specific health issues, and on strategies such as human rights documentation and strategic litigation
|
|
|
Examples include: Practitioners’ Guide project; work with law clinics; Health and Human Rights Resource Guide; integrating health and legal services; etc.
|
|
|
There is increasing demand to provide human rights training to health providers as a complement to this strategy
|
|
|
However, LAHI lacks the experience or expertise with reaching out to this audience or evaluating proposals to do so
|
|
|
For LAHI, the ultimate goal of such training must be a reduction of human rights abuses against specific patient groups, i.e. people living with HIV, people needing palliative care, LGBT communities, sex workers, IDUs, and Roma
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goals of the meeting
|
|
|
1. To be better prepared to evaluate funding proposals for human rights trainings of health providers and to design our own initiatives in this area
|
|
|
2. To expand our network of external experts who can assist us in these efforts
|
|
|
|
|
|
Overview of the agenda
|
|
|
Tamar Ezer
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plenary discussion: Can Training Change Practice?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Break-out groups: Mapping different approaches to “training”
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise I: Practicing evaluating a sample proposal
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise II: Designing the 2009 LAHI Salzburg Seminar
|
|
|
|
|
10:30
|
Coffee Break
|
|
|
|
|
11:00
|
Plenary Panel: Can Training Change Practice?
|
|
|
Moderator: Jonathan Cohen
|
|
|
|
|
|
Session description: The goal of this session is to identify do’s and don’ts for ensuring that human-rights training actually changes the behavior and practice of health providers. Panelists will answer the following questions in relation to human rights trainings they have conducted:
|
|
|
|
|
|
What change in behavior or practice did you seek through training?
|
|
|
How did you set about accomplishing this?
|
|
|
What sustained or derailed this effort?
|
|
|
If it did not work, why not?
|
|
|
What would you have done differently?
|
|
|
Any indications of success?
|
|
12:45
|
Lunch
|
|
|
|
|
14:00
|
Introduction to afternoon exercise
|
|
|
Jonathan Cohen
|
|
|
|
|
14:30
|
Break-outs: Mapping “trainings” by audience and training type
|
|
|
|
|
|
Session description: The goal of this session is to produce a collection of successful models for training of health providers, according to two categories: (1) the audience being trained (health workers or health managers), and the type of training (awareness-raising, skills-building, or knowledge-development). Using a grid, participants will discuss good models in break-out groups and then present them in plenary. For each model, participants will discuss the following questions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Where on the grid is this training best situated?
|
|
|
|
|
|
What was the goal of the training?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Who was the audience for the training, and why?
|
|
|
|
|
|
What were the learning objectives? Did the training focus on raising awareness, imparting knowledge, or teaching skills?
|
|
|
|
|
|
What was the training methodology? What materials did the training use?
|
|
|
|
|
|
What if any were the measurements of success for this training?
|
|
|
|
|
16:00
|
Coffee break
|
|
|
|
|
16:30
|
Reports backs and discussion
|
|
|
Joanna Erdman
|
|
|
|
|
17:30
|
Introduction to next day’s sample proposal exercise
|
|
|
Tamar Ezer
|
|
|
|
|
18:30
|
Group dinner
|
|
|
|
|
Day 2, 23- October
|
|
|
|
|
|
9:00
|
Overview of the Day
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jonathan Cohen, Tamar Ezer
|
|
|
|
|
9:15
|
Exercise I: Group review of sample proposal
|
|
|
|
|
|
Session description: The goal of this session is to develop and apply a framework for evaluating funding proposals for human rights training of health providers. In two groups, participants will evaluate a sample proposal according to the questions below. They will then compare their evaluations in plenary discussion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Does the proposal identify a clear goal? If so, what is the purpose behind the training?
|
|
|
What if any are the learning objectives? Does the training focus on raising awareness, imparting knowledge, or teaching skills?
|
|
|
What if any is the training methodology? What materials does the training use?
|
|
|
What if any are the measurements of success for this training?
|
|
|
What are the strengths of the proposal?
|
|
|
What are the weaknesses of the proposal?
|
|
|
Would you recommend funding this proposal? Why or why not?
|
|
|
|
|
9:45
|
Report backs and discussion
|
|
|
Liesl Gerntholtz
|
|
|
|
|
10:30
|
Coffee break
|
|
|
|
|
10:45
|
Exercise II: Designing the 2009 LAHI Salzburg Seminar
|
|
|
|
|
|
Session description: The goal of this session is to practice designing a human rights training for health providers by designing, in small groups, three options for LAHI’s 2009 Salzburg Seminar.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Overview and description of Salzburg Seminar
|
|
|
Tamar Ezer
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 23-27, 2009 in Salzburg, Austria
|
|
|
|
|
|
Can have up to 35 participants: 5 country teams of up to 7 people
|
|
|
|
|
11:00
|
Groups to develop each Salzburg Seminar concept
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the identified training goal:
|
|
|
What audience might you target for the Salzburg Seminar? What health providers would you involve?
|
|
|
What might be the learning objectives?
|
|
|
What methodologies might you use? What materials might be necessary?
|
|
|
What might be the follow up?
|
|
|
What might be the measurements of success?
|
|
|
|
|
12:00
|
Report backs and discussion
|
|
|
Tamar Ezer
|
|
|
|
|
12:00
|
Closing remarks
|
|
|
Jonathan Cohen
|
|
|
|
|
13:00
|
Optional lunch
|
|
|
|
|
18:00
|
Optional buffet dinner
|